Classic SQL Server backup set fails with VDIRemote OpenCommunicator named pipe errors

Modified on Mon, 28 Sep at 12:21 PM

Classic SQL Server backup set fails with VDIRemote OpenCommunicator named pipe errors

Machine-distilled from a resolved support ticket on 2026-09-28. Source ref: 476099e2e56f. Verify before relying on it.

Applies to: DS-Client backing up SQL Server using classic SQL Server backup sets (VDI based) on Windows backup source servers; version not confirmed.

Symptom: A classic SQL Server backup set completes with errors on every run, reporting a VDIRemote named pipe error such as 'The system cannot find the file specified. (VDIRemote: OpenCommunicator(...\pipe\ASIGRA_SQLBACKUP_VDI_<database>...))'. Related variants include 'All pipe instances are busy. (VDIRemote: OpenCommunicator(...))' and 'The specified network name is no longer available. (VDIRemote: OpenCommunicator(...))' or '(VDIRemote: Read data from named pipe)'. Running a synchronisation and re-running the backup does not clear the error.

Cause: Memory fragmentation on the backup source server (the Windows server hosting the SQL Server instance being backed up) prevents the VDI named pipe communication between the DS-Client and SQL Server from being established or maintained.

Resolution: 1. Restart the backup source server that hosts the SQL Server instance. 2. On that server, review and increase the page file (virtual memory) size: Control Panel > System (or right click This PC/My Computer > Properties) > Advanced System Settings > Performance > Settings > Advanced tab > Virtual Memory > Change. Note the currently assigned, minimum and recommended values, then increase the size accordingly. 3. Re-run the SQL Server backup set and confirm it completes without the VDIRemote named pipe error.

Was this article helpful?

That’s Great!

Thank you for your feedback

Sorry! We couldn't be helpful

Thank you for your feedback

Let us know how can we improve this article!

Select at least one of the reasons
CAPTCHA verification is required.

Feedback sent

We appreciate your effort and will try to fix the article